Truitt v. Bowers et al
Ashley Doyle Truitt |
Keith Bowers and Craighead County Detention Center |
3:2021cv00035 |
February 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Ashley Doyle Truitt re #3 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoners, Complete IFP form. (fjg) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying without prejudice #1 IFP Motion; directing the Clerk to send plaintiff another IFP application, an inmate account calculation sheet, and a certificate of your inmate account, along with a copy of this Order; directing plaintiff to complete and sign the IFP application, have an authorized jail/prison official complete and sign the institutional account certificate and calculation sheet, and return all forms to the Clerk on or before 3/12/2021; and directing Craighead County Detention Center officials to assist you in completing the necessary forms. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/12/2021. (ljb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ashley Doyle Truitt.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ashley Doyle Truitt. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.