Doe v. Highland School District et al
| Jacob H Miller and Doe |
| Jane Doe, Tammy Reese, Gina Abney, Payne Abney, Highland School District and Kelly Geoffrion |
| 3:2021cv00055 |
| March 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to change Plaintiff's name to "Doe". (thd) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/1/2021 and Jury Trial set for 6/13/2022 at 9:30 AM in Jonesboro, Arkansas Courtroom (large) #324 before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 3/10/2021. (hml) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Gina Abney, Payne Abney, Kelly Geoffrion, Highland School District, Tammy Reese.(ajt) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Gina Abney, Payne Abney. (ajt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jacob H Miller.(ajt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gina Abney, Payne Abney, Kelly Geoffrion, Highland School District, Tammy Reese from Sharp County Circuit Court, case number 68CV-2021-2. Fee $402 paid, receipt number LIT081192. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
