Arnett v. Norris et al
| Carolyn Arnett |
| Nurzuhal Faust, Wendy Kelley, Christopher Budnik, Maggie Capel, Kenneth DeWitt, Roy Hobbs, Larry Norris, Stacey Smith, Linda Dixon, Linda Dykes, John Maples, John Mark Wheeler and Don Yancey |
| 3:2021cv00088 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Kenneth DeWitt.(Rosenzweig, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to 2 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Kristine G. Baker. (jak) |
Filing 2
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(c) and General Order No. 39, this case belongs with Judge Baker. The Clerk is directed to transfer the case to Judge Baker's docket. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 5/5/2021. (hml)(Docket text modified on 5/6/2021 to correct a typographical error)(jak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Carolyn Arnett. (Fee $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT081953.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
