Walker v. Arkansas, State of et al
Robert Lance Walker |
Pointsett County Sheriff Office, Liz Wagner, Jimmy Gallaway, Scott Ellington, Ron Hitts, Jerry Robertson, Joseph Hughes, Brian Miles and Arkansas, State of |
3:2021cv00122 |
July 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #4 Order by Robert Lance Walker. (llg) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 402.00 received, receipt number LIT083406. (mdo) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to the Court by Robert Lance Walker. (kdr) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #3 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to send Walker an IFP application, including calculation sheet; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Greene County Detention Center. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 08/10/2021. (ajt) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Lance Walker. (kdr) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk to send an IFP application, along with a prison calculation sheet to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/12/2021. (llg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Lance Walker.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.