Mallett v. Davis et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Mallett
Defendant: Kenneth Davis, John K Sparks, Jr, Richard E Lee, Robert Freeman and John P Moss
Case Number: 3:2021cv00157
Filed: August 5, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his free exercise claims against Defendants Sparks, Lee, Freeman, and Moss. Defendant Davis be dismissed without prejudice from this lawsuit because Plaintiff has not pled a plausible claim against him. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/14/2021. (lej)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that the Clerk shall prepare summons and the USM shall serve Defendants Freeman, Sparks, Lee, and Moss without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/14/2021. (lej)
September 14, 2021 Summons Issued as to Robert Freeman, Richard E Lee, John P Moss, John K Sparks, Jr. and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh)
August 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel #4 . A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered Plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that Plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the Plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that Plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/26/2021. (lej)
August 26, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Christopher Mallett. (kdr)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Grimes Unit Warden, ADC Trust Bank, and the ADC Compliance Office. Service is not appropriate at this time. The Clerk shall mail a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form to Plaintiff with a copy of this order. If Plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is partially deficient and some of his claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/11/2021. (lej)
August 5, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Mallett.(kdr)
August 5, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Mallett. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mallett v. Davis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Mallett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John K Sparks, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard E Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John P Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?