Grant v. Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company et al
| Jennifer Broadhurst Grant |
| Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company and Ford Motor Company |
| 3:2021cv00195 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #34 Order, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/10/2023. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER approving and adopting, except for Section III.A, #33 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; and denying #21 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/10/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 33 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Ms. Grant's motion for summary judgment be denied and judgment be entered in favor of Defendants #21 . Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/6/2022. (lej) |
|
Filing 32
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER REFERRING MOTION: The #21 MOTION for Summary Judgment is referred to Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe for a Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court thanks Judge Volpe in advance for his work on this matter. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 6/3/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 31 REPLY to Response to Motion re #21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 30 RESPONSE re #23 Statement of Facts (Local Rule 56.1) filed by Ford Motor Company. (Nelson, Karl) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE in Opposition re #21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit)(Nelson, Karl) |
| Filing 28 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #27 Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company. (Hetherington, Thomas) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re #21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 1)(Hetherington, Thomas) |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE re #23 Statement of Facts (Local Rule 56.1) filed by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company. (Hetherington, Thomas) |
|
Filing 25
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #24 Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #21 MOTION for Summary Judgment, #23 Statement of Facts (Local Rule 56.1), #22 Brief in Support. Response due by 4/11/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/22/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 24 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #21 MOTION for Summary Judgment , #23 Statement of Facts (Local Rule 56.1), #22 Brief in Support by Ford Motor Company, Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company (Hetherington, Thomas) |
| Filing 23 STATEMENT OF FACTS (Local Rule 56.1) re #21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 22 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant (Lacy, Brandon) |
|
Filing 20
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #19 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief. Plaintiff's brief is due by 3/7/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/15/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Brief by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 18 SEALED DOCUMENT. (fjg) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Leave to File Stipulation Administrative Record under seal. It is ordered that a public and redacted version of the administrative record need not be separately filed. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/31/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Stipulated Administrative Record Under Seal by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company (Hetherington, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
SECOND AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER - ERISA CASE. The parties must file the stipulated administrative record on or before 1/31/2022. Plaintiff must move for judgment and file his or her brief within 21 calendar days after the stipulated record is filed (on or before 2/21/2022). Defendants must respond to the motion and file their responding briefs within 21 calendar days after the Plaintiff's brief is filed (on or before 3/14/2022). Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 10 calendar days after Defendants file their briefs (on or before 3/24/2022). Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/10/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct #13 Scheduling Order,,, Terminate Motions,, by Ford Motor Company (Nelson, Karl) |
|
Filing 13
AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER ERISA CASE granting #12 parties' Joint Motion to Amend Final Scheduling Order. The parties must file the stipulated administrative record on or before 1/10/2022. Plaintiff must move for judgment and file his or her brief within 21 calendar days after the stipulated record is filed (or on or before 1/31/2022). Defendants must respond to the motion and file their responding briefs within 21 calendar days after the Plaintiff's brief is filed (or on or before 2/22/2022). Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 10 calendar days after Defendants file their briefs (or on or before 3/4/2022). Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 12/17/2021. (kdr)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct #11 Scheduling Order, by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company (Hetherington, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER - ERISA CASE: Stipulated record to be filed within 45 days of this Order. Plaintiff's brief due 21 days after the filing of the stipulated record. Defendants' brief due 21 days after the Plaintiff's brief. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, due 10 days thereafter. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/5/2021. (hml) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Ford Motor Company (Nelson, Karl) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ford Motor Company.(Nelson, Karl) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company (Hetherington, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company.(Hetherington, Thomas) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER re #5 Stipulation to Extend Time to File a Responsive Pleading Pursuant to Local Rule 6.2(a). Answer due by 11/4/2021. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 10/14/2021. (hml)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant Ford Motor Co. to File a Responsive Pleading Pursuant to Local Rule 6.2(a) by Ford Motor Company. (Nelson, Karl) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Karl G. Nelson on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Nelson, Karl) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint and Summons , filed by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant. Ford Motor Company served on 9/23/2021. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint and Summons , filed by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant. Unicare Life And Health Insurance Company served on 9/23/2021. (Lacy, Brandon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jennifer Broadhurst Grant. Fee $402; Receipt No. LIT083741. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
