Brooks v. Rogers et al
| Jerome Kendall Brooks |
| Shane Rogers, Mark Harmony, Matthew Duvall and Cynthia Brandon |
| 3:2021cv00245 |
| November 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER directing Brooks to either pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or file an application proceed in forma pauperis by 1/7/2022 or his case will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court directs the Clerk to mail Brooks an IFP Application. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/7/2021. (jak)
|
| Filing 3 Case electronically transferred in from District of Arkansas Western; Case Number 5:21-cv-05210. Electronic file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of Arkansas, Northern Division. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on November 29, 2021. (tg) [Transferred from arwd on 11/30/2021.]
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Cynthia Brandon, Matthew Duvall, Mark Harmony, Shane Rogers, filed by Jerome Kendall Brooks.(tg) [Transferred from arwd on 11/30/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
