Stewart v. McCown et al
| Phillip Dewayne Stewart, Shaquile Israel and Shaquile Lebron Israel |
| Patrick McGown, S Williams and Patrick McCown |
| 3:2021cv00256 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Northern Division Office |
| Edie R Ervin |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Stewart's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/31/2022. (jak) |
Filing 3
ORDER withdrawing the reference. Stewart's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/31/2022. (jak)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing Plaintiff if he wishes to proceed with this action, he must pay the $402 filing and administrative fee within 30 days. If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, this lawsuit will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 12/15/2021. (jak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Phillip Dewayne Stewart. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
