Manohar v. Tate et al
Plaintiff: Lakhraj Manohar
Defendant: Tate, S Richardson and Doe
Case Number: 3:2022cv00001
Filed: January 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Brian S Miller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2022 Filing 8 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT consistent with #6 Order, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/28/2022. (jak)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER dismissing this case without prejudice. If Manohar would like to continue with this case, he must first pay the filing fee of $402 to the clerk within 30 days of the date of this Order along with a motion to reopen this case. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/28/2022. (jak)
January 19, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Motion. CORRECTION: The original document was attached to the docket in error (case number not included) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to #4 docket entry and is attached hereto for service/review by the parties. (cmn)
January 18, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lakhraj Manohar. (llg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/19/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct) (cmn).
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying without prejudice #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Manohar is directed to either pay the $402 filing fee or file a complete IFP application within 30 days, or his case will be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to mail Manohar an IFP application, including certificate and calculation sheet, along with a copy of this Order and a copy of the docket sheet. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/6/2022. (jak)
January 4, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Lakhraj Manohar. (llg)
January 4, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lakhraj Manohar. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manohar v. Tate et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakhraj Manohar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?