Richardson v. McGinnis
Plaintiff: Angela Richardson
Defendant: Dennis McGinnis
Case Number: 3:2022cv00082
Filed: March 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Referring Judge: J Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Dennis McGinnis served on 5/11/2022. (kth)
May 3, 2022 Filing 7 PARTIAL RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that Richardson's retaliation claim against McGinnis be dismissed, without prejudice. Objections due 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 5/3/2022. (jak)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER allowing Richardson to proceed with her racial discrimination claims against McGinnis. The Clerk is directed to prepare summons for McGinnis. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, #2 complaint, and this Order on McGinnis through the ADC Compliance Office without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 5/3/2022. (jak)
May 3, 2022 Summons Issued as to Dennis McGinnis and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 IFP motion. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to collect an initial partial filing fee of $82.23 from Richardson's institutional account and send that amount along with future monthly payments from his institutional account to the Clerk of Court until a total of $350 has been paid. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the McPherson Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 4/28/2022. (jak)
April 25, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angela Richardson. (ldb)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying #1 IFP motion. If plaintiff wishes to pursue this action, then on or before 4/29/2022 plaintiff must either pay the $402 filing fee in full or file a properly completed IFP Motion, along with a properly completed prison trust fund account statement and calculation sheet signed by an authorized prison official. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff an IFP Application along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 3/30/2022. (jak)
March 28, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Angela Richardson. (ldb)
March 28, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angela Richardson. (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. McGinnis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis McGinnis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?