Bragg v. BNSF Railway Company
| Scotty Bragg |
| BNSF Railway Company |
| 3:2022cv00098 |
| April 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| James M Moody |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to randomly reassign this case to another district judge. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/13/2022. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 8
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER vacating #7 initial scheduling order. An order of recusal shall be entered and the new assigned judge will issue a scheduling order. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/13/2022. (ljb)
|
| (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #9 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge James M. Moody Jr. (jak) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 7/18/2022; Rule 26(f) Report due by 8/1/2022; Jury Trial proposed for sometime during the week of 11/13/2023 at 9:30 a.m. in Jonesboro Courtroom #324 before Judge Brian S. Miller. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 5/12/2022. (ljb) [VACATED pursuant to 8 ORDER] (jak) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #5 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in error (editable image file). The correct document was added to docket entry #5 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brooks E. Kostakis on behalf of BNSF Railway Company (Kostakis, Brooks) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/12/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct (submitted 5/12/2022)) (jak). |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by BNSF Railway Company (Reifers, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by BNSF Railway Company.(Reifers, Stephanie) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scotty Bragg. BNSF Railway Company served on 4/19/2022. (Wolff, Nelson) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against BNSF Railway Company filed by Scotty Bragg. Fee $402; Receipt No. JON001072. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bragg v. BNSF Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scotty Bragg | |
| Represented By: | Nelson Gregory Wolff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Camille Reifers |
| Represented By: | Brooks E. Kostakis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
