Sullivan v. Simpson et al
Richard Sullivan |
Kirk Simpson, Robert Crestman, Devon Stroud and Jacob Saffell |
3:2022cv00107 |
April 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. Robert Crestman served on 5/21/2022. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. Jacob Saffell served on 5/22/2022. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. Devon Stroud served on 5/7/2022. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Sullivan. Kirk Simpson served on 5/7/2022. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Robert Crestman, Jacob Saffell, Kirk Simpson, Devon Stroud.(Newell, C.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Richard Sullivan against All Defendants. (Fee $ 402, Receipt Number LIT086532.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.