Fells v. Atlas Tube Arkansas Inc et al
| Jordan Fells |
| Atlas Tube Arkansas Inc and Zekelman Industries Inc |
| 3:2022cv00134 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Atlas Tube Arkansas Inc, Zekelman Industries Inc.(Hoffman, Ashton) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric R. Magnus on behalf of Atlas Tube Arkansas Inc, Zekelman Industries Inc (Magnus, Eric) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashton Prager Hoffman on behalf of Atlas Tube Arkansas Inc, Zekelman Industries Inc (Hoffman, Ashton) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Atlas Tube Arkansas Inc, Zekelman Industries Inc (Hoffman, Ashton) |
| Filing 3 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (cmn) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jordan Fells. (wbb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Missippi County Circuit Court, case number 47BCV-22-109. Fee $402 paid, receipt #JON001093. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
