Hubbard v. Faulkner et al
Carl Vester Hubbard |
Justin G Faulkner, Ronnie William and Catherine Dean |
3:2022cv00187 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Hubbard's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/30/2022. (jak) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Hubbard's custodians are directed to collect monthly payments from his prison trust account and forward them to the Clerk of Court until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Court directs the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Mississippi County Detention Facility. Hubbard's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Court recommends this dismissal count as a "strike" and that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/30/2022. (jak) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Carl Vester Hubbard. (ldb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Vester Hubbard. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.