Dunavin v. Does
Kenneth Richard Dunavin |
Does Poinsett County Jail, Does Poinsett County Jail; "Quade", Guard, Jonesboro; "Tabatha", Guard and Susan Duffel |
3:2022cv00189 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Edie R Ervin |
D P Marshall |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Susan Duffel.(Thomas, JaNan) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by JaNan Arnold Thomas on behalf of Susan Duffel (Thomas, JaNan) |
Filing 16 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Kenneth Richard Dunavin re #12 Order. (jbh) |
Filing 15 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Kenneth Richard Dunavin re #10 Notice. (jbh) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Susan Duffel served on 8/29/2022. (kth) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Kenneth Richard Dunavin re #5 Amended Complaint, #9 Notice to the Court. (fjg) |
Filing 12 ORDER directing Mr. Dunavin if he wants to pursue this case, he must notify the Court of his current address within 30 days. Failure to comply with this Order is likely to result in the dismissal of this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 8/29/2022. (jak) |
Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Kenneth Richard Dunavin re #7 Order, #8 Supplement. (fjg) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (llg) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to the Court by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (kdr) |
Filing 7 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare a summons for Defendant Susan Duffel. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve Ms. Duffel with a summons and a copy of the #1 complaint and #5 amended complaint by certified mail, restricted delivery, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. #6 Motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 8/16/2022. (jak) |
Summons Issued as to Susan Duffel and forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service. (ldb) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to #5 Amended Complaint, by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (ldb) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (wbb) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (llg) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 motion for leave to proceed IFP. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to collect monthly payments from his prison trust account and forward them to the Clerk of Court until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Office, and the Warden of the Poinsett County Detention Facility. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days from the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 8/3/2022. (jak) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (wbb) |
Filing 2 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS. Directing the Clerk of Court to mail plaintiff an IFP application along with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff must return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay a $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 7/26/2022. (jak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kenneth Richard Dunavin. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.