Ward v. Boyd et al
James D Ward |
Marty Boyd and Craighead County Jail |
3:2022cv00226 |
August 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jerome T Kearney |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT pursuant to #3 Order, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/11/2022. (jak) |
Filing 3 ORDER because plaintiff has failed to respond, his complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/11/2022. (jak) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing Plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or an in forma pauperis motion within 30 days of the entry date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff an in forma pauperis motion, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/30/2022. (jak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by James D Ward.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.