Poe v. Weeks et al
| Ryan Poe |
| Adam Weeks, Calvin Harrell and Paula Woodside |
| 3:2022cv00234 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT consistent with #3 Order, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/15/2022. (jak)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Poe's custodian is directed to withdraw the initial partial filing fee and forward that amount along with future monthly payments to the Clerk of Court until the statutory filing fee has been paid in full. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Sharp County Detention Facility. Poe's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, his complaint is dismissed without prejudice. It is recommended that this dismissal counts as a "strike" and an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/15/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ryan Poe. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ryan Poe. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
