Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters v. Travis et al
Plaintiff: Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters
Defendant: Justin Travis, Travis Transit and UC Leigh, Jr
Case Number: 3:2022cv00258
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Brian S Miller
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint on Justin Travis, filed by Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters. Justin Travis served on 11/3/2022. (Cresswell, James)
November 9, 2022 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint on Travis Transit, filed by Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters. Travis Transit served on 11/3/2022. (Cresswell, James)
November 4, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Complaint on U.C. Leigh, Jr., filed by Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters. UC Leigh, Jr served on 11/3/2022. (Cresswell, James)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #2 motion to appear pro hac vice filed by Gregory G. Barnett. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/24/2022. (ljb)
October 20, 2022 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM re #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Gregory G. Barnett. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4376765. Filed filed by Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters. (Cresswell, James)
October 20, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Gregory G. Barnett. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4376765. Filed by Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Gregory Barnett)(Cresswell, James)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters. (Filing Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT088500.) Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters v. Travis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amwins Specialty Logistics Underwriters
Represented By: Gregory G Barnett
Represented By: James L. Cresswell, Jr.
Represented By: Gregory G. Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Travis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travis Transit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UC Leigh, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?