Cullen v. Jackson
Plaintiff: John Patrick Cullen
Defendant: Moses Jackson
Case Number: 3:2022cv00265
Filed: October 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Edie R Ervin
Referring Judge: D P Marshall
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Retrieve Court Transcript without payment by John Patrick Cullen. (kdr)
November 2, 2022 Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by John Patrick Cullen. (kdr)
October 25, 2022 Filing 6 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that Mr. Cullen's 1983 claims, over which the Court has original jurisdiction be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to state a plausible claim for relief. To the extent that Mr. Cullen seeks to pursue a negligence or other state law claim, the Court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismiss such claims without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). The Court should certify that an in forma pauperis appeal would be frivolous and not in good faith, and, in the future, this dismissal shall constitute a "strike". The Clerk should be instructed to close this case. Objections due 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 10/25/2022. (jak)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's custodians are directed to collect the $350 filing fee by forwarding monthly payments collected from plaintiff's prison trust account to the Clerk of Court until the fee is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, the ADC Compliance Division, and the Warden of the Ouachita River Unit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 10/18/2022. (jak)
October 14, 2022 Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from District of Arkansas Western; Case Number 5:22-cv-05213. Electronic file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to District of Eastern District of Arkansas. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on October 14, 2022. (bjb) [Transferred from arwd on 10/14/2022.]
October 14, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by John Patrick Cullen. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(bjb) [Transferred from arwd on 10/14/2022.]
October 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Moses Jackson, filed by John Patrick Cullen.(bjb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2022: #1 Attachments) (bjb). [Transferred from arwd on 10/14/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cullen v. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Patrick Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moses Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?