Wilkins v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Shamim Rahim Wilkins |
| US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Laura B Zuchowkski and Laura B Zuchowski |
| 3:2023cv00132 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shamim Rahim Wilkins (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 3 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court notifying party that #1 Complaint lacks an original signature (F.R.Cv.P. 11(a) and Local Rule 5.5(c)(1)). (cmn) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate summons were issued and returned to counsel for service. (jak) |
Filing 2
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (wbb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants filed by Shamim Rahim Wilkins. Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number JON164. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) (Docket text modified on 6/1/2023 to indicate summons were issued)(jak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/15/2023: #2 Main Document - Correct) (cmn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
