Borreson et al v. Nitro Lift Technologies LLC et al
| Alexis Borreson and Jada Borreson |
| Nitro Lift Technologies LLC and Lacy Jones, Jr |
| 3:2023cv00142 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 8/25/2023; Rule 26(f) Report due by 9/8/2023. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 9/23/2024 at 9:15 AM in Jonesboro Courtroom # 324 before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 8/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Nitro Lift Technologies LLC. (jak) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Lacy Jones, Jr, Nitro Lift Technologies LLC.(jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Alexis Borreson, Jada Borreson.(jak) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lacy Jones, Jr, Nitro Lift Technologies LLC from Lawrence County Circuit Court, case number 38CV-23-45. Fee of $402; receipt number LIT2567. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
