Gray v. Houchin et al
| Rubby James Gray |
| Houchin and Susan Duffel |
| 3:2023cv00248 |
| December 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT dismissing Gray's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/2/2024. (jak) |
Filing 3
ORDER adopting #2 recommendation; strike recommended; and any in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/2/2024. (jak)
|
|
Filing 2
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and this case be closed #1 . Dismissal of this action be counted, in future, as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order adopting this recommendation and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/4/2024. (lej)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Rubby James Gray. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
