Morris v. White et al
Curtis Morris |
Jacob White and J B Hoyer |
3:2024cv00081 |
May 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Northern Division Office |
Edie R Ervin |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER directing Morris to file a complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order; instructing the Clerk to provide Mr. Morris a blank 1983 complaint form, along with a copy of this Order; and denying #2 Mr. Morris' motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 05/15/2024. (llg) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the appropriate ADC offices and the Warden of the Greene County Detention Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 05/15/2024. (llg) |
DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD. (kbc) Docket text modified on 5/15/2024 to indicate filed in error. (kbc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Curtis Morris. (csf) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Curtis Morris. (csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.