Horne v. Teague et al
Rodney Horne |
James Michael Teague, Corey James Rains, Marty Daniel Boyd, John Does, Christopher Michael Lawrence and Craighead, County of |
3:2024cv00191 |
October 15, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 1/14/2025; Rule 26(f) Report due by 1/28/2025. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 3/16/2026 at 9:15 AM in Jonesboro Courtroom # 324 before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/25/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) (Docket text modified on 11/26/2024 to correct a typographical error)(jak) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Answer. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to remove duplicate text. (jak) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by James Michael Teague, Corey James Rains, Christopher Michael Lawrence, Marty Daniel Boyd, Craighead, County of.(Jones, Jamie Marie)(Docket text modified on 11/6/2024 to remove duplicate text)(jak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Rodney Horne. Summons issued as to All Defendants and returned to counsel. (Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT8169.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ajj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.