Coorstek Inc v. Electric Melting Services Company Inc
| 4:2006cv01726 |
| December 27, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| George Howard |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 86 plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $44,607.00 and costs in the amount of $350.00. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/10/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 71 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the alternative, for a new trial. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/12/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
67
JUDGMENT in favor of CoorsTek Inc against Electric Melting Services Company Inc re 66 Order in the sum of $77,576.00, together with interest from this date until paid at the rate of.96% per annum, together with costs as the Court may find allowable. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/8/08. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/2/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coorstek Inc v. Electric Melting Services Company Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
