Mackool v. Norris

Plaintiff: Michael Mackool
Defendant: Larry Norris
Case Number: 4:2008cv00269
Filed: March 31, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 19, 2009 16 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT : Consistent with the 15 Memorandum and Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docket entry #1) is DENIED, and this habeas action is hereby DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/19/09. (hph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mackool v. Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Mackool
Represented By: Thomas William Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?