Jamerson v. Pope County et al
| Cheryl E Jamerson |
| Pope County, Pope County Sheriff's Department, Pope County Detention Center, Jay Winters, Terry Bailey, Danny Sorey, Jamie Gray, Chris Johnston, Darrel Mears, Peter Hamilton and Mark Melton |
| 4:2008cv00651 |
| August 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Out of State |
| Henry L. Jones |
| James M. Moody |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts' 46 Motion to Dismiss; pltf's complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/6/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 30 Partial Report and Recommendations denying as moot plaintiff's 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; 15 granting Motion to Extend Time in which to serve defts Benefield, Johnston, Hamilton and Melton for sixty days 18 Motion to Dismiss Party denied as to deft Pope County and granted as to Pope County Sheriff's Department and Pope County Detention Center; and directing that plaintiff notify the court no later than September 30, 2009, as to whether she has retained counsel to represent her in this lawsuit, or if she intends to proceed without counsel. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/8/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
