Holloway et al v. Lott et al
| Charmmorcus Holloway, Sr, Emmanuel Doc Scott and Mashan Lee |
| Wes Lott, Jason Harris, Macrice Sanders and Alison Walton |
| 4:2008cv00821 |
| August 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Pulaski |
| G. Thomas Eisele |
| H. David Young |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
JUDGMENT pursuant to 113 Order Granting Summary Judgment for defts, all remaining claims asserted by pltf are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 2/3/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER DENYING 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; DENYING 46 Plaintiff's Motion for Order for Examination; and directing the Clerk to note the Docket Sheet that 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/28/2009. (jas)
|
|
Filing
12
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR (duplicate of docket entry 13 ) - DISREGARD. (mkf) (Docket text modified on 12/5/2008 to indicate the document was filed in error.) (thd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER finding that Mashan Lee and Emmanuel Scott should be removed from the Court's docket as Plaintiffs in the instant case, and their names terminated as parties to this action. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 10/16/2008. (thd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
