Burrell v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
Plaintiff: Rodney Burrell, Sr
Defendant: Sherwood Arkansas, City of, Kelvin Nicholson, Vernon Blocker and Scott McFarland
Case Number: 4:2008cv02517
Filed: September 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: William R. Wilson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Rodney Burrell, Sr against Vernon Blocker in the amount of $40,000 compensatory damages and $75,000 punitive damages; in favor of Rodney Burrell, Sr. against Scott McFarland in the amount of $75,000 in punitive damages, for a total of $190,000.00, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of.26% per annum until paid. Attorneys fees will be determined pursuant to Local Rule 54.1. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 9/3/10. (bkp)
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT re 24 Jury Verdict in favor of Rodney Burrell, Sr against Vernon Blocker in the sum of $40,000 compensatory damages and $75,000 punitive damages; and in favor of Rodney Burrell, Sr against Scott McFarland in the amount of $7 5,000 punitive damages, for a total award of $195,000 plus post-judgment interest at the rate of.26% per annum until paid, attorneys' fees to be determined pursuant to Local Rule 54.1. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 9/2/10. (bkp)
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 14 defts' Motion in Limine; denying 16 pltf's Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 8/30/10. (bkp)
May 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 5/27/10. (bkp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burrell v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Burrell, Sr
Represented By: Austin Porter, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sherwood Arkansas, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelvin Nicholson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vernon Blocker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott McFarland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?