Watson v. Saline County Jail

Watson v. Saline County Jail

Plaintiff:	Rodney Watson
Defendant:	Saline County Jail
Case Number:	4:2008cv02681
Filed:	September 17, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office
County:	Saline
Presiding Judge:	G. Thomas Eisele
Presiding Judge:	J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 25, 2009	Filing 63 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Order of Dismissal that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, and Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all claims set forth herein. Furt her, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order of Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/25/09. (hph)
November 6, 2008	Filing 20 ORDER adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Defendant Saline County Jail with prejudice; certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this O rder would not be taken in good faith; directing the Clerk to prepare summons for Defendants Mehr, Sessions, and Reed; and, directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, Complaint and Amended Complaints without prepayment of fees, costs or security therefor. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 11/6/2008. (thd)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 25, 2009

Filing 63 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the Order of Dismissal that was entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed, without prejudice, and Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all claims set forth herein. Furt her, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order of Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/25/09. (hph)

November 6, 2008

Filing 20 ORDER adopting 11 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Defendant Saline County Jail with prejudice; certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this O rder would not be taken in good faith; directing the Clerk to prepare summons for Defendants Mehr, Sessions, and Reed; and, directing the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, Complaint and Amended Complaints without prepayment of fees, costs or security therefor. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 11/6/2008. (thd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. Saline County Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Watson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Saline County Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?