Towne v. Arkansas Veterans Home et al
Arline Towne |
Arkansas Veterans Home, David Fletcher, Mike Turner and Albert Wilson |
4:2008cv03585 |
October 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Pulaski |
James M. Moody |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 JUDGMENT : Pursuant to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered on this date, Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/31/09. (hph) |
Filing 39 ORDER authorizing plaintiff's counsel, Rickey Hicks, to bring cell phones and electronic devices into the courthouse for this proceeding scheduled to begin July 27, 2009. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/24/09. (bkp) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 defts' Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing deft Mike Turner. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/17/09. (bkp) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Discovery to allow plaintiff up to and including June 22, 2009 in which to complete depositions; granting 20 Motion for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions up to and including June 26, 2009. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/10/09. (bkp) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 3 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/29/09. (bkp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.