Gamble v. Parker et al
| Veronica Gamble |
| Shirley Parker, Co-Tina Williams and Baptist Health |
| 4:2008cv04160 |
| November 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Pulaski |
| William R. Wilson |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT in favor of Baptist Health, Cotina Williamson, Shirley Parker against Veronica Gamble re 48 Order granting Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 2/4/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
43
LETTER ORDER re 35 Brief in Support filed by Veronica Gamble directing counsel to respond to this letter by noon, Friday, February 5, 2010, by e-mail or fax. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 2/1/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER directing the Clerk to change the name of defendant Co-Tina Williams to Cotina Williamson. Signed DOC by Mary A. Johnson, Deputy Clerk, on 1/26/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER re 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defendants, directing the plaintiff to respond to the motion by 12:00 noon, on Friday, January 29, 2010. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 1/22/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Veronica Gamble. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/3/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
