McCastle v. First Capital Management Group

Plaintiff: Sammie McCastle
Defendant: First Capital Management Group
Case Number: 4:2008cv04222
Filed: December 22, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: G. Thomas Eisele
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 5, 2009 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER VACATING 4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; the U.S. Marshal's Office is directed not to serve the complaint and summons; DENYING 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Sammie McCastle, DENYING 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sammie McCastle; case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 1/5/09. (mkf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCastle v. First Capital Management Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sammie McCastle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Capital Management Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?