White v. Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
| Rodney Charles White, Sr |
| Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles, Leroy Brownlee, Lynn Story, John Felts, John Belkins, Carolyn Robinson, Richard Mays, Jr and Abraham Carpenter |
| 4:2009cv00090 |
| February 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Pulaski |
| William R. Wilson |
| H. David Young |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations, dismissing plaintiff's complaint with prejudice, counting this dismissal as a "strike," and certifying that an ifp appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this case is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 4/14/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
7
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Pltf's 2 Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; this dismissal count as a "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); the Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action be considered frivolous and not in good faith; Objections to R&R due by 4/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 3/26/09. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
