Henson v. Hawker Beechcraft Corporation et al
| Robert Henson |
| Hawker Beechcraft Corporation and Hawker Beechcraft Services Inc |
| 4:2009cv00440 |
| June 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT pursuant to 39 Opinion and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, and Hawker Beechcraft Global Support Corporation, dismissing the complaint of Robert Henson with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/10/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER continuing the 7/19/10 trial with a new trial date & scheduling deadlines to be set by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/2/2010. (jct)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER authorizing Denise Hoggard, Kathlyn Graves, Megan Monsour and Terry Mann to bring electronic devices to the courthouse on 6/30/10. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 6/30/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 16 Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines; Motions and Status Reports due by 6/7/2010. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/7/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING 14 JOINT MOTION to Extend Deadlines; Motions and Status Reports due by 6/4/2010. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/19/10. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
