Willis v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
| Natalie E Willis |
| Department of Housing and Urban Development, Wilson & Associates PLLC, STS Realty and Auction LLC, Freddye M Norwood Trust, Sandra E Love and C&L Service Corporation/Morris-Griffin Corporation |
| 4:2009cv00490 |
| July 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| James M. Moody |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER denying 51 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 51 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 52 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 54 Motion for Order; denying 55 Motion to Set Aside Order; finding as moot 56 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/4/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting defts' motions for summary judgment 21 30 ; denying plaintiff's motion to strike 11 , motion to produce 24 and motions to set aside 25 33 and remanding a portion of the case to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County; directing the Clerk to close the case and to send the file to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Pulaski County forthwith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/1/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER directing the pro se plaintiff to be familiar and comply with all federal rules, as well as the local rules of this court. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/11/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
