Green Party of Arkansas et al v. Daniels
| Green Party of Arkansas, Mark Swaney and Rebekah Kennedy |
| Charlie Daniels |
| 4:2009cv00695 |
| August 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER grantin 37 Secretary Daniels's motion for summary judgment; denying as moot 58 Motion for summary judgment; denying as moot 60 Motion in Limine; and denying as moot 77 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/29/10. (hph)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER directing deft to respond to 34 Pltfs' MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on or before 5/18/10; pltf's reply due 5/25/10; pltfs are directed to respond to 37 Deft's MOTION for Summary Judgment on or before 5/21/10; deft's reply due 5/28/10. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/10/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting deft's 29 Motion to Extend the Dispositive Motions Deadline; Dispositive motions due by 5/7/2010. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/29/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
16
OPINION AND ORDER that 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charlie Daniels is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/16/09. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Appear as counsel. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/28/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
