Hurdsman et al v. Salkeld et al
| Rodney A Hurdsman, Willie Fleetwood, Golden Bowman, Roderick Silinzy, Antonio Kelly, Edward Jennings, Michael Hancock, Anyanso Agwu, Kyle Smith and Chris Smith |
| James L Salkeld, Ronald E Baker, Ronald L Clark, Jonathan Bibb, Charles Covington, Gary Ferrel, Danny King, Dan McAlister, Harry Chaple, Kenneth Lamkin and Lee Danner |
| 4:2009cv00892 |
| November 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| St. Francis |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
ORDER reopening the dispositive-motion period. Hurdsman and Fleetwood shall file a cross motion for summary judgment by 10/5/12. Responses are due 10/19/12. Jury Trial is reset for 12/10/2012 09:30 AM before Judge D. P. Marshall Jr.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/25/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER denying 106 Motion to Abstain; denying 106 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 108 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Motions due by 8/20/12, responses due 8/31/12, and replies are due 9/7/12. The Court will hold a pretrial on 9/21/12. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/1/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER ADOPTING 89 Partial Report and Recommendations except on the service issue. Defts' motions to dismiss 31 40 are granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' conspiracy claims and Federal Administrative Procedures Act claims are dismissed without prejudice. Lamkin is still a deft, but only in his official capacity, and the style should be amended accordingly; the Arkansas Attorney General's motion to be relieved as counsel for Lamkin 71 is granted. Plaintiffs' motion for appt. of counsel is granted 28 ; and plaintiffs' motion for joinder 38 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/18/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER adopting 59 and 67 Magistrate Judge Volpe's recommended dispositions, with three clarifications to 67 ; denying 54 and 57 Kenneth Lamkin and Lee Danner's Motion to Dismiss and Motions for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot any other pending motions by these five Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/3/10. (hph)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER re Plaintiff Hurdsman's 37 MOTION for Reconsideration: the Motion will be GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is directed to re-instate Michael Hancock as a party Plaintiff in this case. Plaintiff's motion on behalf of Silinzy and Je nnings is DENIED. If Plaintiffs Silinzy and Jennings wish to remain in this lawsuit, they must file their own Motions for Reconsideration and must each submit an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official of the detention center at which they are confined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/19/2010. (jas)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting pltfs 30 days from the entry of this Order to file their responses to defts' 31 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/6/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, plaintiffss Bowman, Silinzy, Kelly, Jennings, Hancock, Agwu and Chris Smith for their failure to comply with the Court's earlier orders 17 8 . Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/19/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
