Arkansas, State of v. Seibert

Plaintiff: Arkansas, State of
Defendant: Matt Seibert
Case Number: 4:2009cv00960
Filed: December 29, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1605 Consumer Credit Protection - Finance Charge
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 23, 2011 28 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT JUDGMENT, deft consents to judgment in a total amount of $477,100.00. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/23/11. (vjt)
July 8, 2010 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING pltf's 14 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline; Discovery and dispositive motions due by 10/18/2010. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/8/10. (vjt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arkansas, State of v. Seibert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arkansas, State of
Represented By: Peggy J. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Seibert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?