Stanton v. Holiday et al
| Jeffrey Mark Stanton |
| Doc Holiday, Carl Johnson, Strickland and Jackson |
| 4:2010cv00134 |
| February 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Henry L. Jones |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
JUDGMENT : Consistent with the order entered today, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice and the relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/12/12. (hph)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING 41 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting the 32 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carl Johnson. Separate deft Carl Johnson is dismissed from plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/7/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER directing pltf to file a response to 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carl Johnson within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/1/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the original and amended complaints and summons on defts without prepayment of costs therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 4/13/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
