Springer et al v. Welspun Pipes Inc
| Lisa Springer and Crystal Daniels |
| Welspun Pipes Inc |
| 4:2010cv00252 |
| April 20, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT pursuant to 41 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Welspun Pipes Inc dismissing the complaint of Crystal N Daniels and Lisa Springer with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/29/11. (vjt)
|
Filing
37
ORDER authorizing Elizabeth R. Cummings and Sheila Johnson to bring electronic devices into the courthouse in Little Rock, between 2/14/11 and 2/17/11, subject to the rules stated in this Order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/7/11. (vjt)
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying deft's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/27/11. (vjt)
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting deft's 19 Motion to Extend Deadline for filing motions for summary judgment; Motions due by 1/5/2011. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/22/10. (vjt)
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting pltf's 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; Discovery due 12/16/10. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/17/10. (vjt)
|
Filing
11
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/4/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.