Creasman v. Dish Network LCC et al
William P Creasman |
Dish Network LCC, Dish DBS Corporation and Dish Network Corporation |
4:2010cv00392 |
May 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
James M. Moody |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 JUDGMENT re 40 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/29/11. (kpr) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 15 Motion to Strike; and dismissing plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/28/11. (kpr) |
Filing 39 ORDER adopting 38 Stipulation for Extension of Ddls to Conduct Class Certification Discovery and File Class Certifications Papers and amending the class action-related ddls, as set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/17/11. (kpr) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting 35 MOTION for Garry T. Stevens, Jr., to Appear pro hac vice as co-counsel for pltf in this matter. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/7/11. (vjt) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting 32 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice of Zuzuna S. Ikels for deft. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/7/11. (bkp) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Olimpio Lee Squitieri to Appear pro hac vice as additional counsel for pltf in this matter. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/15/10. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.