Doxa Total Design Strategy Inc v. Doxa Enterprises Inc

Plaintiff: Doxa Total Design Strategy Inc
Defendant: Doxa Enterprises Inc
Case Number: 4:2010cv00717
Filed: June 21, 2010
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: William R. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28:1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 3, 2010 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 4 Motion for Limited Admission of Mark Boardman to appear pro hac vice and directing Mr. Boardman to register for CM-ECF by 5 p.m., Tuesday, August 17, 2010; and directing the Clerk to send Mr. Boardman an CM-ECF registration form. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 8/3/10. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doxa Total Design Strategy Inc v. Doxa Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doxa Total Design Strategy Inc
Represented By: Mark Murphey Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doxa Enterprises Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?