Helena Chemical Company v. Porter et al
Plaintiff: Helena Chemical Company
Defendant: Danny W Porter, Sarah Porter and Justin Porter
Case Number: 4:2010cv01193
Filed: September 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 103 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Helena Chemical Company against Danny W Porter, Sarah Porter, and Porter Farms, jointly and severally, the principal sum of $139,051.09 on its breach of contract claim plus attorney fees in the amount of $64,641.37, together with interest from this date until paid at the rate of 0.20% as provided by law. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/30/12. (vjt)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment 22 57 ; defts Danny W. Porter, Sarah Porter, and Porter Farms have up to and including 15 days from the entry of this Order to file objections to pltf's claims for damages and attorneys' fees 95 ; the Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to defts Danny W. and Sarah Porter by certified mail. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/22/12. (vjt)
January 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting 89 Joint MOTION to Dismiss all claims against deft Justin Porter with prejudice; 86 MOTION to Extend Time is moot; defts Danny Porter, Sarah Porter, and Porter Farms have up to and including 14 days from the entry of this Order to answer the second amended complaint; 87 MOTION by Stephen L. Gershner and Benjamin A Kent to Withdraw as counsel of record for defts Danny W Porter, Sarah Porter, and Porter Farms is GRANTED; attorneys Gershner and Kent are directed to mail a copy of this Order and the second amended complaint to separate defts, via certified mail, return receipt requested, and to file an affidavit of mailing with the Court. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/5/12. (vjt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helena Chemical Company v. Porter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helena Chemical Company
Represented By: Roger D. Rowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danny W Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sarah Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?