Brown v. Byrd et al
| Sammie L Brown |
| Karl Byrd, Phillips and John Randall |
| 4:2010cv01391 |
| September 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT pursuant to 13 Memorandum and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/8/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER denying 8 Motion to Certify Class; granting 9 Motion for Extension of Time and directing the plaintiff to submit either the $350 statutory filing fee or an ifp application within 15 days of the entry date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send to plaintiff an ifp application, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/1/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER directing the plaintiff to submit either the $350 statutory filing fee or an ifp application within 30 days of the entry date of this Order, and directing the Clerk to mail to plaintiff an ifp application, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/27/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
