Allen v. Byrd et al
Eric L Allen |
Karl Byrd, Bobby Brown, Givens, Phillips, Bryant, John Randall, Porter and John Doe |
4:2010cv01452 |
October 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Faulkner |
Beth Deere |
Susan Webber Wright |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 JUDGMENT : Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case should be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/29/11. (hph) |
Filing 41 ORDER Adopting Partial Report and Recommendation 15 denying 40 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 14 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/24/11. (bkp) |
Filing 31 ORDER adopting 10 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety; dismissing Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Byrd without prejudice; dismissing Defendant Byrd as a party Defendant; dismissing Plaintiff's claims regarding the failure of Defendants Brown, Givens, Randall, and Porter to respond to Plaintiff's grievances with prejudice; dismissing Defendants Brown and Randall as party Defendants; and dismissing Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/22/2010. (thd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.