Hill v. Williams et al
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hill
Defendant:
Estate of Joe Kelly Hardin, Does, Phillip H Shirron, John W Cole, Dan Harmon, Chris E Williams, Bob Adams, Norman Mark Klappenbach, Harold King, Richard A Garrett, Eddy R Easley, Norman B Frisby, Estate of Sherman Bell, Bob Frazier, Crain, Arkansas Attorney General and Sheridan Arkansas, City of
Case Number:
4:2011cv00074
Filed:
February 1, 2011
Court:
Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:
Little Rock Office
County:
Jefferson
Presiding Judge:
D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights
Cause of Action:
42:1983
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| April 27, 2012 | 47 |
ORDER denying 46 Motion for Recusal.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/27/12. (kpr)
|
| April 23, 2012 | 44 |
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice; denying motions to amend (10 & 35), and denying the remaining post-remand motions, (39, 41, 42, 43) as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/23/12. (kpr)
|
| July 8, 2011 | 23 |
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (wrong case). (kpr) (Docket text modified on 7/8/2011.) (thd).
|
| June 21, 2011 | 16 |
JUDGMENT : Hill's complaint and amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/21/11. (hph)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
