Sheets v. Edwards et al
Brandon T Sheets |
Clayton Edwards, Jeff Hacker, Sanchez and Advanced Medical |
4:2011cv00357 |
April 26, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
White |
Jerome T. Kearney |
James M. Moody |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 re 71 Order Adopting dismissing complaint with prejudice and denying the relief sought. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/12/12. (kpr) |
Filing 63 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (See docket entry 62 .)(kpr) (Docket text modified on 6/6/2012, per instructions from Chambers.) (thd). |
Filing 44 ORDER denying 42 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/26/12. (kpr) |
Filing 37 ORDER denying 36 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on August 11, 2011. He is currently incarcerated at the Wrightsville Unit. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/14/12. (kpr) |
Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING 9 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing deft Advanced Medical for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/27/11. (kpr) |
Filing 11 ORDER directing the U.S. Marshal to serve summons, complaints 2 8 , and this Order on defts Edwards, Hacker, and Sanchez without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/9/11. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.