Haley v. University of Arkansas

Plaintiff: Tiana Haley
Defendant: University of Arkansas
Case Number: 4:2011cv00480
Filed: June 14, 2011
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 19, 2012 15 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT re 14 Order dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/19/12. (kpr)
October 20, 2011 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 6 Response to Motion filed by Tiana Haley. Haley's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the ADEA are dismissed without prejudice. She may proceed on her Title VII and Equal Pay Act claims. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/20/11. (kpr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haley v. University of Arkansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Arkansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiana Haley
Represented By: Reggie Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?