Linzy v. Lawman et al
| Leon Linzy |
| David Lawman and James Mayfield |
| 4:2011cv00615 |
| August 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Phillips |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
JUDGMENT pursuant to the 35 Order entered on this date, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/14/2014. (mmd)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER staying the time to respond to the 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Plaintiff's time to respond is stayed until one week after the entry of an Order from the Court addressing whether Mr. Lawman is required to reveal the name of the confidential source. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/17/14. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER staying the pending 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiff's time to respond to the pending motion until one week after the entry of an Order from the Court addressing whether Mr. Lawman is required to reveal the name of the confidential source; and granting 20 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/25/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER removing this matter from the Court's trial docket for the week of November 13, 2012. The trial set will be reset by separate order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/8/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
